August 14, 2022

Maserietv.com

Review and News

David Beckham acts as easiest guy as his father Ted, 73, marries spouse, 62, in intimate rite

Ricky Ponting slams ‘pathetic officiating’ from the third umpire after Ben Stokes dismisses David Warner...

Ricky Ponting slams ‘pathetic officiating’ from the third umpire after Ben Stokes dismisses David Warner off a no-ball… handing Australia opener reprieve in frustrating first session for visitors on second day of Gabba Test

Ben Stokes thought he had dismissed David Warner with his fourth ball of match 
But replays showed the England all-rounder had bowled a no ball at the Gabba 
Channel 7 showed that his previous three balls of the over were also no balls
Ex-Australia captain Ricky Ponting criticised Pau Wilson’s failure to spot them 

By Kishan Vaghela For Mailonline
Published: 02:32 GMT, 9 December 2021 | Updated: 03:10 GMT, 9 December 2021

Ricky Ponting has slammed the ‘pathetic officiating’ that saw Australia opener David Warner handed a reprieve after being bowled off a no-ball by Ben Stokes.
The England all-rounder – bowling in the Test arena for the first time since returning from a break to protect his mental health – looked to have dismissed Warner with just his fourth ball of the match.

But replays showed that the England star had overstepped by some distance, leading Warner to be called back.

Ricky Ponting (L) has slammed the ‘pathetic officiating’ that saw Australia opener David Warner handed a reprieve after being bowled off a no-ball by Ben Stokes (R)

Stokes thought he had taken the wicket of Warner after bowling him off his fourth ball

But Stokes had overstepped, meaning Warner was called back after being castled

Australia’s Channel 7 then showed that Stokes’ first three balls leading up to the non-wicket of Warner were also no-balls, but which simply remained uncalled by the third umpire Paul Wilson.
And that led former Australia captain Ponting to slam the officiating, believing Stokes would have corrected his overstepping earlier had he known he was bowling no-balls.
‘If someone upstairs is supposed to be checking these and they haven’t decided that any of those are a no ball, that’s just pathetic officiating as far as I’m concerned,’ Ponting said on Channel 7.
‘It led to what we saw late in the over. If he’d have been called for a no ball the first one he bowled, then of course he’s going to drag his foot back.

See also  David Petraeus on What Iraq Tells Us About Ukraine

But Stokes had overstepped and after a check the delivery was called a no ball

‘I’m not sure what’s happened. I’m keen to hear why it hasn’t happened earlier.’
Retired umpire Simon Taufel added: ‘The third umpire’s job is definitely the hardest job in the book for me.
‘They really do have a lot going on but they do have the support of an ICC technician. They’re supposed to be looking at every ball.’ 

The task of calling no-balls was transferred to the television umpire from the on-field officials for top-tier international cricket in July last year.
But Cricket Australia said the technology which aids third umpires make these calls is not working in this match and is therefore unavailable.
The third umpire can still check for no balls, but only at the fall of a wicket, as was the case when Stokes thought he had dismissed Warner.
What will be more worrying for England is that Warner has gone to make a Test hundred on four previous occasions after surviving a dismissal off a no-ball. 

Simon Taufel (centre) also could not understand why the three Stokes no balls were not called

And he got to his fifty after lunch, while Marnus Labuschagne had reached his 31st Test 50.
England meanwhile took just the scalp of opener Marcus Harris in the first session, with Dawid Malan catching his edge low down off Ollie Robinson.
But Labuschagne and Warner re-built to take Australia to 113 for one at the end of the opening session of day two at the Gabba. 

See also  Liverpool wait on superstar duo and United desire a win – Premier League speaking issues

Warner went on take advantage, coming to within two of his half century before lunch

Marnus Labuschagne meanwhile did bring up his half-century in the opening session

Share or comment on this article: